<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Line Around the Outer Edge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pcwrede.com/blog/a-line-around-the-outer-edge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/a-line-around-the-outer-edge/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:03:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray Woodland</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/a-line-around-the-outer-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1883</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray Woodland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1883</guid>
		<description>The distinction between the two kinds is really worth making.  My version of a usable working outline is an ever-changing contents list and a long series of mutually incompatible sketches and speculations.  I did once do a regular portion-and-outline for a tie-in line that accepted unsolicited submissions in that form.  Got a rather good individual rejection, too - though not the only good-enough kind, that says, &quot;Change and resubmit&quot;.  Boy, that taught me a few things:

1) Boiling down to outline length hurts.

2) Chapter-by-chapter belongs to my writing process, and is not necessarily optimal for the publisher&#039;s outline.  Even if one of the chapter titles is among the best &lt;i&gt;evah&lt;/i&gt;.  Here is your &quot;#2 with maybe a bit of #1&quot; writ large.

3) Even in a series that&#039;s all about time travel, don&#039;t assume the poor overworked slush-reader will correctly follow the plot&#039;s screwing about with time unless one frames the trick in ruby-studded gold and bolts it to the wall.  This may require one to remember point (2) above.

4) After boiling it down to a skeleton in (1), dancing with it just ain&#039;t the same.  Specifically, trying to write from the result is the same kind of fun as trying to read an Agatha Christie novel - whilst consulting a set of exam notes before embarking on every chapter.  Darn, point (2) again!

Things I&#039;m not so sure I&#039;ve learned:

a) You can get away with half-a-dozen named characters in the outline?  Good gravy.  I hate to think how many I had.  One reason was space - &#039;the King of Essex&#039; eats words a lot faster than &#039;Gary&#039;.

b) I&#039;m okay with my WIP - write first draft my way, check; write publisher outline afterwards, check; redraft both and submit, got it.  But I am a denizen of the slushpile.  Being a professional who presumably can&#039;t afford to write a whole novel whose outline nobody offers to commission - how much leeway do you have with that outline, once it&#039;s sold?  And how do you frame the outline to give you maximum breathing-room?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The distinction between the two kinds is really worth making.  My version of a usable working outline is an ever-changing contents list and a long series of mutually incompatible sketches and speculations.  I did once do a regular portion-and-outline for a tie-in line that accepted unsolicited submissions in that form.  Got a rather good individual rejection, too &#8211; though not the only good-enough kind, that says, &#8220;Change and resubmit&#8221;.  Boy, that taught me a few things:</p>
<p>1) Boiling down to outline length hurts.</p>
<p>2) Chapter-by-chapter belongs to my writing process, and is not necessarily optimal for the publisher&#8217;s outline.  Even if one of the chapter titles is among the best <i>evah</i>.  Here is your &#8220;#2 with maybe a bit of #1&#8243; writ large.</p>
<p>3) Even in a series that&#8217;s all about time travel, don&#8217;t assume the poor overworked slush-reader will correctly follow the plot&#8217;s screwing about with time unless one frames the trick in ruby-studded gold and bolts it to the wall.  This may require one to remember point (2) above.</p>
<p>4) After boiling it down to a skeleton in (1), dancing with it just ain&#8217;t the same.  Specifically, trying to write from the result is the same kind of fun as trying to read an Agatha Christie novel &#8211; whilst consulting a set of exam notes before embarking on every chapter.  Darn, point (2) again!</p>
<p>Things I&#8217;m not so sure I&#8217;ve learned:</p>
<p>a) You can get away with half-a-dozen named characters in the outline?  Good gravy.  I hate to think how many I had.  One reason was space &#8211; &#8216;the King of Essex&#8217; eats words a lot faster than &#8216;Gary&#8217;.</p>
<p>b) I&#8217;m okay with my WIP &#8211; write first draft my way, check; write publisher outline afterwards, check; redraft both and submit, got it.  But I am a denizen of the slushpile.  Being a professional who presumably can&#8217;t afford to write a whole novel whose outline nobody offers to commission &#8211; how much leeway do you have with that outline, once it&#8217;s sold?  And how do you frame the outline to give you maximum breathing-room?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superscout</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/a-line-around-the-outer-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>superscout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>you should really think about doing a book on boy scouts or cub scouts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you should really think about doing a book on boy scouts or cub scouts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcwrede</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/a-line-around-the-outer-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>pcwrede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>Chicoy - That&#039;s a system that works really well for those of us who can&#039;t actually follow outlines for more than a chapter or so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chicoy &#8211; That&#8217;s a system that works really well for those of us who can&#8217;t actually follow outlines for more than a chapter or so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicoy</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/a-line-around-the-outer-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1859</guid>
		<description>I tend toward a `two or three chapters ahead&#039; outline -where I figure out what I&#039;ll do next not long before I do it.  I&#039;m getting away from that a little as I practice writing and story-planning, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend toward a `two or three chapters ahead&#8217; outline -where I figure out what I&#8217;ll do next not long before I do it.  I&#8217;m getting away from that a little as I practice writing and story-planning, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcwrede</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/a-line-around-the-outer-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1857</link>
		<dc:creator>pcwrede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1857</guid>
		<description>Alex - I&#039;ve never been able to follow an outline to save my life, but once the book is done, I find that it&#039;s often a useful revising tool. This is one of those cases where mileage varies, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex &#8211; I&#8217;ve never been able to follow an outline to save my life, but once the book is done, I find that it&#8217;s often a useful revising tool. This is one of those cases where mileage varies, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Fayle</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/a-line-around-the-outer-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Fayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found that doing the first sort of outline really helps with the revision process. Once I&#039;ve finished the first draft, I&#039;ll outline the book which highlights where I&#039;ve gone off track (as well as many other first draft problems).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found that doing the first sort of outline really helps with the revision process. Once I&#8217;ve finished the first draft, I&#8217;ll outline the book which highlights where I&#8217;ve gone off track (as well as many other first draft problems).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

