<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heinlein&#8217;s Rules for Writing (Mostly)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pcwrede.com/blog/heinleins-rules-for-writing-mostly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/heinleins-rules-for-writing-mostly/</link>
	<description>Patricia C. Wrede talks about writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:55:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impatience &#124; youthful yogini worried writer</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/heinleins-rules-for-writing-mostly/comment-page-1/#comment-36628</link>
		<dc:creator>Impatience &#124; youthful yogini worried writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 03:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=791#comment-36628</guid>
		<description>[...] this set of rules. However, it seems solid enough and a good place to start. For me, in my process, “editorial order” is my brother. He is my first reader and helps me to see my writing through a reader’s eyes. I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this set of rules. However, it seems solid enough and a good place to start. For me, in my process, “editorial order” is my brother. He is my first reader and helps me to see my writing through a reader’s eyes. I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/heinleins-rules-for-writing-mostly/comment-page-1/#comment-10756</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 22:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=791#comment-10756</guid>
		<description>Ah okay. thank you!  love your site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah okay. thank you!  love your site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcwrede</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/heinleins-rules-for-writing-mostly/comment-page-1/#comment-10591</link>
		<dc:creator>pcwrede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=791#comment-10591</guid>
		<description>Jacques - I&#039;m sorry, but I don&#039;t have a cite; I just recall it being a nine-days wonder in the writing community in the mid-to-late 80s. I don&#039;t think it was an interview, and it was always clear that whatever he did, he didn&#039;t do very much of it until an editor got involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacques &#8211; I&#8217;m sorry, but I don&#8217;t have a cite; I just recall it being a nine-days wonder in the writing community in the mid-to-late 80s. I don&#8217;t think it was an interview, and it was always clear that whatever he did, he didn&#8217;t do very much of it until an editor got involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/heinleins-rules-for-writing-mostly/comment-page-1/#comment-10573</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 04:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=791#comment-10573</guid>
		<description>Fascinating post. I know it was written awhile ago but I just discovered it today!

You said: &quot;Late in his career, Heinlein himself admitted that he did, in fact, revise/rewrite his work before sending it out,&quot;

Would you cite the source for that? I searched on the net and still can&#039;t find it. I have most of his interviews, if you give me the year he said this in I can track it down if you don&#039;t have the source as a link.

Thank you
Jacques</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating post. I know it was written awhile ago but I just discovered it today!</p>
<p>You said: &#8220;Late in his career, Heinlein himself admitted that he did, in fact, revise/rewrite his work before sending it out,&#8221;</p>
<p>Would you cite the source for that? I searched on the net and still can&#8217;t find it. I have most of his interviews, if you give me the year he said this in I can track it down if you don&#8217;t have the source as a link.</p>
<p>Thank you<br />
Jacques</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicory</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/heinleins-rules-for-writing-mostly/comment-page-1/#comment-2636</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=791#comment-2636</guid>
		<description>I totally fall into the second category of writers- those who need someone to pry the manuscript out of my hands to stop me from giving it just one (million) more polish. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally fall into the second category of writers- those who need someone to pry the manuscript out of my hands to stop me from giving it just one (million) more polish. <img src='http://pcwrede.com/blog/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcwrede</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/heinleins-rules-for-writing-mostly/comment-page-1/#comment-2633</link>
		<dc:creator>pcwrede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=791#comment-2633</guid>
		<description>Ilse - As I said, Heinlein wrote these rules in a completely different market. These days, you can exhaust the paying venues for a piece of short fiction in six months or less, you can&#039;t make a living writing short fiction anyway, and it&#039;s harder than ever to get a book publisher to look at an unpublished newbie&#039;s work.

Alex - About eight or ten years back, Dean and I had a ... spirited discussion on the old AOL boards about revising. He was a lot more dogmatic then about the universal value of writing fast and not rewriting, as I remember it. Judging from this, he&#039;s refined his theory of how and why this works so well for some people. A lot of what he says is spot-on, particularly the thing about how the writer&#039;s experience while writing has &lt;em&gt;nothing &lt;/em&gt;to do with the quality of the product, and in addition, he makes a strong point of the fact that every writer works differently. My only major complaint would be that we ended up posting about Heinlein&#039;s rules within a week of each other, and he got there first!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilse &#8211; As I said, Heinlein wrote these rules in a completely different market. These days, you can exhaust the paying venues for a piece of short fiction in six months or less, you can&#8217;t make a living writing short fiction anyway, and it&#8217;s harder than ever to get a book publisher to look at an unpublished newbie&#8217;s work.</p>
<p>Alex &#8211; About eight or ten years back, Dean and I had a &#8230; spirited discussion on the old AOL boards about revising. He was a lot more dogmatic then about the universal value of writing fast and not rewriting, as I remember it. Judging from this, he&#8217;s refined his theory of how and why this works so well for some people. A lot of what he says is spot-on, particularly the thing about how the writer&#8217;s experience while writing has <em>nothing </em>to do with the quality of the product, and in addition, he makes a strong point of the fact that every writer works differently. My only major complaint would be that we ended up posting about Heinlein&#8217;s rules within a week of each other, and he got there first!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Fayle</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/heinleins-rules-for-writing-mostly/comment-page-1/#comment-2631</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Fayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=791#comment-2631</guid>
		<description>Dean Wesley Smith has a good take on what rewriting means - and it&#039;s more towards that line of revising long past the point of usefulness.

http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=1826</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean Wesley Smith has a good take on what rewriting means &#8211; and it&#8217;s more towards that line of revising long past the point of usefulness.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=1826" rel="nofollow">http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=1826</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilse</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/heinleins-rules-for-writing-mostly/comment-page-1/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 17:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=791#comment-2629</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that #5 also doesn&#039;t work when you take into consideration #3...i.e. if you have something out there that you&#039;ve been trying to get published for a decade, maybe you should take another look at it and see if you can improve it, then try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that #5 also doesn&#8217;t work when you take into consideration #3&#8230;i.e. if you have something out there that you&#8217;ve been trying to get published for a decade, maybe you should take another look at it and see if you can improve it, then try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
