<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitchy, twitchy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pcwrede.com/blog/twitchy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/twitchy/</link>
	<description>Patricia C. Wrede talks about writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:55:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Slog &#187; Liana Mir</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/twitchy/comment-page-1/#comment-38164</link>
		<dc:creator>The Slog &#187; Liana Mir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 01:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=652#comment-38164</guid>
		<description>[...] &quot;Twitchy, Twitchy&quot; by Patricia C. Wrede   What do you think of this post?Love It&#160;(0) Helpful&#160;(0) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &quot;Twitchy, Twitchy&quot; by Patricia C. Wrede   What do you think of this post?Love It&nbsp;(0) Helpful&nbsp;(0) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: green_knight</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/twitchy/comment-page-1/#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>green_knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=652#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>What I like about it is that it&#039;s completely pressure-free. I don&#039;t set myself a target to write every day, or write x words per session - just to look at the file. And there are days and weeks when I don&#039;t do anything else, because the Swamp Thing in particular needs a lot of thinking effort before I can write - but at the same time, I don&#039;t give myself a chance to forget about the story and be distracted.

I&#039;m all for learning to recognise your habits and standing your ground when people reccommend that books ought to have a hero and heroine, or that one finds the secondary characters in the Hero&#039;s Journey, or that one must (outline, write every day, whatever). However, I think it&#039;s a good idea to balance it with reviews- are those just habits habits, or are they habits that work for you? 

One reason burst writing didn&#039;t work for me was that I did not stay in touch with the story, and thus needed longer to get into it, and duplicated efforts, and contradicted myself. I still do those things, but not as much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I like about it is that it&#8217;s completely pressure-free. I don&#8217;t set myself a target to write every day, or write x words per session &#8211; just to look at the file. And there are days and weeks when I don&#8217;t do anything else, because the Swamp Thing in particular needs a lot of thinking effort before I can write &#8211; but at the same time, I don&#8217;t give myself a chance to forget about the story and be distracted.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for learning to recognise your habits and standing your ground when people reccommend that books ought to have a hero and heroine, or that one finds the secondary characters in the Hero&#8217;s Journey, or that one must (outline, write every day, whatever). However, I think it&#8217;s a good idea to balance it with reviews- are those just habits habits, or are they habits that work for you? </p>
<p>One reason burst writing didn&#8217;t work for me was that I did not stay in touch with the story, and thus needed longer to get into it, and duplicated efforts, and contradicted myself. I still do those things, but not as much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcwrede</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/twitchy/comment-page-1/#comment-2319</link>
		<dc:creator>pcwrede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=652#comment-2319</guid>
		<description>green-knight - The next thing you will learn is that when you tell people this, they will nod wisely and say that opening the file three or four times a day and doing a paragraph or a sentence at a time sounds like a great idea...and they will then go away and not do it. (The ones who say that they absolutely can&#039;t work that way are a small step up - at least they admit up front that they&#039;re not even going to try.) Seriously, though, everybody has their own tricks for persuading themselves to do the write-a-little-every-day thing, and this sounds like one of the better ones. Habit is a really useful thing, when you can make it work FOR you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>green-knight &#8211; The next thing you will learn is that when you tell people this, they will nod wisely and say that opening the file three or four times a day and doing a paragraph or a sentence at a time sounds like a great idea&#8230;and they will then go away and not do it. (The ones who say that they absolutely can&#8217;t work that way are a small step up &#8211; at least they admit up front that they&#8217;re not even going to try.) Seriously, though, everybody has their own tricks for persuading themselves to do the write-a-little-every-day thing, and this sounds like one of the better ones. Habit is a really useful thing, when you can make it work FOR you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: green_knight</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/twitchy/comment-page-1/#comment-2314</link>
		<dc:creator>green_knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=652#comment-2314</guid>
		<description>I used to be a burst writer, and not very impressive bursts either. (My all-time record is 8K in a day; normal  peaks were 3-5K, and not many days of those either.) Inbetween, long fallow times.

I doubled my productivity by employing a simple rule: every morning when I sit down at my computer, I&#039;d open the current file. And before I go to lunch, I&#039;d do the same. And in the afternoon, the same. Most of the time, I can see either something I can improve, or the next paragraph. Sometimes more than a paragraph. And thus, I write most days, even if it&#039;s only fifty words here, a couple of hundred words there. On most books - not on the WIP, which is different - I can steadily write 1K in a day, sometimes more, with ordinary good days coming in around 2.5K - but there might be one or two in any given week, instead of once a month. 

Sadly, this hasn&#039;t helped me much towards publication as I tend to write long (I&#039;m a natural trilogist), and so far, I haven&#039;t hit all the right notes. (&#039;Great, but I can&#039;t sell this&#039; is better for the ego than &#039;no thanks&#039; but not by much.) I have more hopes for the WIP, but I&#039;m a quarter through drafting the second volumen, and it will need considerable rewriting before I can even start submitting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to be a burst writer, and not very impressive bursts either. (My all-time record is 8K in a day; normal  peaks were 3-5K, and not many days of those either.) Inbetween, long fallow times.</p>
<p>I doubled my productivity by employing a simple rule: every morning when I sit down at my computer, I&#8217;d open the current file. And before I go to lunch, I&#8217;d do the same. And in the afternoon, the same. Most of the time, I can see either something I can improve, or the next paragraph. Sometimes more than a paragraph. And thus, I write most days, even if it&#8217;s only fifty words here, a couple of hundred words there. On most books &#8211; not on the WIP, which is different &#8211; I can steadily write 1K in a day, sometimes more, with ordinary good days coming in around 2.5K &#8211; but there might be one or two in any given week, instead of once a month. </p>
<p>Sadly, this hasn&#8217;t helped me much towards publication as I tend to write long (I&#8217;m a natural trilogist), and so far, I haven&#8217;t hit all the right notes. (&#8216;Great, but I can&#8217;t sell this&#8217; is better for the ego than &#8216;no thanks&#8217; but not by much.) I have more hopes for the WIP, but I&#8217;m a quarter through drafting the second volumen, and it will need considerable rewriting before I can even start submitting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: filkferengi</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/twitchy/comment-page-1/#comment-2262</link>
		<dc:creator>filkferengi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=652#comment-2262</guid>
		<description>I get similarly twitchy if I go more than a week without reading a good book.  With the way you write, &amp; the way I read, we&#039;re a perfect match!

Thanks for starting &amp; posting these insightful discussions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get similarly twitchy if I go more than a week without reading a good book.  With the way you write, &amp; the way I read, we&#8217;re a perfect match!</p>
<p>Thanks for starting &amp; posting these insightful discussions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/twitchy/comment-page-1/#comment-2235</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=652#comment-2235</guid>
		<description>Sadly, my problem is the opposite. I usually have a story to work on and do in a desultory fashion (despite the small men). But I get into funks over whether or not to move on to the next publisher when the current query goes missing in the wash.

The cracks seem to be late at night, which is where I function anyway, so it&#039;s not all bad. Until I have to get up and feed those things.

Thanks for the encouragement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, my problem is the opposite. I usually have a story to work on and do in a desultory fashion (despite the small men). But I get into funks over whether or not to move on to the next publisher when the current query goes missing in the wash.</p>
<p>The cracks seem to be late at night, which is where I function anyway, so it&#8217;s not all bad. Until I have to get up and feed those things.</p>
<p>Thanks for the encouragement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcwrede</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/twitchy/comment-page-1/#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator>pcwrede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=652#comment-2234</guid>
		<description>Deborah - One of the standard mistakes people make when they&#039;re getting started is to write something and then put all their effort into getting that published...and meanwhile, they don&#039;t KEEP writing or start anything new. Kids around all day make it harder, but others have done it, so it&#039;s possible. You just have to find a way to work in the cracks that are available, instead of in larger chunks of time that aren&#039;t. Which is, of course, a lot harder to do than say, but it really is still possible.

Alex - Keeping the pot simmering is half the point of the sentence-a-day trick; if the story is present enough in your head that you can note down another sentence during coffee break, you can get started faster when you do find that hour or two to write. The other half is that daily practice keeps the mental gears looser - and the more they work, the easier it gets. And if you have the kind of brain that CAN&#039;T do an all-day marathon, it&#039;s even more important to get in the every-day-slog habit.

Gray - If you can&#039;t make forward progress, sideways is good. One does need to keep an eye out to be sure one is not just stalling...but as long as it&#039;s pay copy of SOME kind, it will probably keep the brain in gear. For the way you work, it may have to be related pay copy (a side story with the same characters, for instance); for others, a break from the main project to work on some other thing entirely may be what&#039;s indicated. The main thing is NOT to make a habit of stopping!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deborah &#8211; One of the standard mistakes people make when they&#8217;re getting started is to write something and then put all their effort into getting that published&#8230;and meanwhile, they don&#8217;t KEEP writing or start anything new. Kids around all day make it harder, but others have done it, so it&#8217;s possible. You just have to find a way to work in the cracks that are available, instead of in larger chunks of time that aren&#8217;t. Which is, of course, a lot harder to do than say, but it really is still possible.</p>
<p>Alex &#8211; Keeping the pot simmering is half the point of the sentence-a-day trick; if the story is present enough in your head that you can note down another sentence during coffee break, you can get started faster when you do find that hour or two to write. The other half is that daily practice keeps the mental gears looser &#8211; and the more they work, the easier it gets. And if you have the kind of brain that CAN&#8217;T do an all-day marathon, it&#8217;s even more important to get in the every-day-slog habit.</p>
<p>Gray &#8211; If you can&#8217;t make forward progress, sideways is good. One does need to keep an eye out to be sure one is not just stalling&#8230;but as long as it&#8217;s pay copy of SOME kind, it will probably keep the brain in gear. For the way you work, it may have to be related pay copy (a side story with the same characters, for instance); for others, a break from the main project to work on some other thing entirely may be what&#8217;s indicated. The main thing is NOT to make a habit of stopping!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray Woodland</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/twitchy/comment-page-1/#comment-2232</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray Woodland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=652#comment-2232</guid>
		<description>Yes, I need to slog as well, or I dry up.  But that links into that problem I mentioned the other day - if I slog on with something where the inspiration is really running dry, I&#039;m in danger of writing string-jerking drivel, that moves but does not live.  That can poison the whole well of the story for ages.

The discipline I eventually found works something like this:

1) If I&#039;m stuck on one thing and shouldn&#039;t write more of it yet, write something else - if all else fails, a disposable fragment, but done with full force and craft.

2) That out of the way, keep hacking at the problem with the main work, so it doesn&#039;t cool off.  If need be, give myself permission to write crappy exploratory draft until I understand the issues properly.

Pressing example: even my current crappy exploratory draft stalled at the weekend, hitting a point where it made insufficient sense, and I wrote exactly 16 mediocre words of it in two days.  But I also wrote a demented little riff on &lt;em&gt;Beauty and the Beast&#039;s&lt;/em&gt; backstory, and composed all but two lines of a song in between bouts of hacking.  That kept the springs flowing, and now the problem is sort-of-solved and I&#039;m heading into closing the chapter.

I used to lose weeks together to the combination of internal editor paralysis, the drying up of the habit, and the cooling off of the main story.  This habit&#039;s a more comfortable one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I need to slog as well, or I dry up.  But that links into that problem I mentioned the other day &#8211; if I slog on with something where the inspiration is really running dry, I&#8217;m in danger of writing string-jerking drivel, that moves but does not live.  That can poison the whole well of the story for ages.</p>
<p>The discipline I eventually found works something like this:</p>
<p>1) If I&#8217;m stuck on one thing and shouldn&#8217;t write more of it yet, write something else &#8211; if all else fails, a disposable fragment, but done with full force and craft.</p>
<p>2) That out of the way, keep hacking at the problem with the main work, so it doesn&#8217;t cool off.  If need be, give myself permission to write crappy exploratory draft until I understand the issues properly.</p>
<p>Pressing example: even my current crappy exploratory draft stalled at the weekend, hitting a point where it made insufficient sense, and I wrote exactly 16 mediocre words of it in two days.  But I also wrote a demented little riff on <em>Beauty and the Beast&#8217;s</em> backstory, and composed all but two lines of a song in between bouts of hacking.  That kept the springs flowing, and now the problem is sort-of-solved and I&#8217;m heading into closing the chapter.</p>
<p>I used to lose weeks together to the combination of internal editor paralysis, the drying up of the habit, and the cooling off of the main story.  This habit&#8217;s a more comfortable one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Fayle</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/twitchy/comment-page-1/#comment-2231</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Fayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=652#comment-2231</guid>
		<description>Pat - my brain refuses to think about one thing for very long (I can read, play games or format Word documents for hours, but think? 1.5 hours max) so I can&#039;t do all day things. The best I do is 2 to 3 hours on two different projects. You&#039;re right about the sentence or two. I do have time/energy for that every day. I&#039;ll give it a try for a while and see how it goes. If nothing else it will at least cut back that rereading-what-I&#039;ve-written-to-remember-where-I&#039;m-going thing that I do before starting each burst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat &#8211; my brain refuses to think about one thing for very long (I can read, play games or format Word documents for hours, but think? 1.5 hours max) so I can&#8217;t do all day things. The best I do is 2 to 3 hours on two different projects. You&#8217;re right about the sentence or two. I do have time/energy for that every day. I&#8217;ll give it a try for a while and see how it goes. If nothing else it will at least cut back that rereading-what-I&#8217;ve-written-to-remember-where-I&#8217;m-going thing that I do before starting each burst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/twitchy/comment-page-1/#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=652#comment-2230</guid>
		<description>I really hear you on the question of procrastinating. I&#039;m not even close to published yet (still in process of finding an agent/publisher) but I&#039;m beginning to realize that I NEED to start forcing myself to a schedule or I&#039;m going to be in trouble if things actually start happening in that court.

And, of course, the dual distractions of my sons being home from school doesn&#039;t exactly help this resolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hear you on the question of procrastinating. I&#8217;m not even close to published yet (still in process of finding an agent/publisher) but I&#8217;m beginning to realize that I NEED to start forcing myself to a schedule or I&#8217;m going to be in trouble if things actually start happening in that court.</p>
<p>And, of course, the dual distractions of my sons being home from school doesn&#8217;t exactly help this resolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
