<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Working at what isn&#8217;t free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pcwrede.com/blog/working-at-what-isnt-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/working-at-what-isnt-free/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 20:37:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcwrede</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/working-at-what-isnt-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>pcwrede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=150#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>Alex - It sound like a process thing, to me. I know a couple of writers who start with talking heads and then layer on everything else - thoughts, actions, emotions, description - sometimes very mechanically, one thing at a time, sometimes pretty much all at once in a second pass. It can be part of the difference between underwriting and overwriting - but it&#039;s not really a problem as long as you&#039;re aware of it and can put in the missing bits in the second or third draft.

It also depends on your viewpoit character. My latest book has a narrator who is very internally oriented, which is aggravated by the fact that she&#039;s writing a memoir. So she doesn&#039;t provide a lot of physical description, and some readers really dislike that. There isn&#039;t much I can do about it, though; not without totally changing who she is and how she speaks. Sometimes, you just have to live with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex &#8211; It sound like a process thing, to me. I know a couple of writers who start with talking heads and then layer on everything else &#8211; thoughts, actions, emotions, description &#8211; sometimes very mechanically, one thing at a time, sometimes pretty much all at once in a second pass. It can be part of the difference between underwriting and overwriting &#8211; but it&#8217;s not really a problem as long as you&#8217;re aware of it and can put in the missing bits in the second or third draft.</p>
<p>It also depends on your viewpoit character. My latest book has a narrator who is very internally oriented, which is aggravated by the fact that she&#8217;s writing a memoir. So she doesn&#8217;t provide a lot of physical description, and some readers really dislike that. There isn&#8217;t much I can do about it, though; not without totally changing who she is and how she speaks. Sometimes, you just have to live with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: green_knight</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/working-at-what-isnt-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>green_knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=150#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>Alex, one thing that has helped me is to think of items and settings to have agenda, to make sure they don&#039;t just exist, stand, or are passively manipulated. &#039;The mountains rose from the plain&#039; beats &#039;there were big mountains&#039; every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, one thing that has helped me is to think of items and settings to have agenda, to make sure they don&#8217;t just exist, stand, or are passively manipulated. &#8216;The mountains rose from the plain&#8217; beats &#8216;there were big mountains&#8217; every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Fayle &#124; Someday Syndrome</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/working-at-what-isnt-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Fayle &#124; Someday Syndrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=150#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s that I don&#039;t read description when I read books, so when I write I focus on the story, but sometimes it almost comes out as a movie script. 

Or I spend a lot of time inside the MC&#039;s head with their thoughts and emotions, which is what really interests me so I pay no attention to the surroundings.

Description tends to pull me out of the story as I write it, but when I focus on the description I&#039;m able to integrate it well, so it&#039;s not a technique thing - it&#039;s more an inability to focus on the two things at the same time. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s that I don&#8217;t read description when I read books, so when I write I focus on the story, but sometimes it almost comes out as a movie script. </p>
<p>Or I spend a lot of time inside the MC&#8217;s head with their thoughts and emotions, which is what really interests me so I pay no attention to the surroundings.</p>
<p>Description tends to pull me out of the story as I write it, but when I focus on the description I&#8217;m able to integrate it well, so it&#8217;s not a technique thing &#8211; it&#8217;s more an inability to focus on the two things at the same time. <img src='http://pcwrede.com/blog/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcwrede</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/working-at-what-isnt-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>pcwrede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=150#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>Alex - Is it a technique problem - how to write description (without slowing down the story) - or is it the more fundamental problem of what to describe? Also, if you&#039;re used to writing strongly plot-driven things, you may need to do a different &lt;em&gt;kind&lt;/em&gt; of story in order to really get some practice in on description. Or perhaps a different sort of viewpoint character - one who really notices and thinks about his/her surroundings. It depends on what you are trying to do (as always).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex &#8211; Is it a technique problem &#8211; how to write description (without slowing down the story) &#8211; or is it the more fundamental problem of what to describe? Also, if you&#8217;re used to writing strongly plot-driven things, you may need to do a different <em>kind</em> of story in order to really get some practice in on description. Or perhaps a different sort of viewpoint character &#8211; one who really notices and thinks about his/her surroundings. It depends on what you are trying to do (as always).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Fayle &#124; Someday Syndrome</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/working-at-what-isnt-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Fayle &#124; Someday Syndrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=150#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>Of course when I say the &quot;easy part&quot; for the story that&#039;s relative, because as I said in my comment to the last post the first draft is hard in comparison to getting the outline done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course when I say the &#8220;easy part&#8221; for the story that&#8217;s relative, because as I said in my comment to the last post the first draft is hard in comparison to getting the outline done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Fayle &#124; Someday Syndrome</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/working-at-what-isnt-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Fayle &#124; Someday Syndrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=150#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>I entered my current novel with an idea to get descriptive. I battled for a while with telling the story while being the descriptive and in the first draft I&#039;ve decided to just get the story down (the easy part) then work like a dog understanding good story-integrated description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I entered my current novel with an idea to get descriptive. I battled for a while with telling the story while being the descriptive and in the first draft I&#8217;ve decided to just get the story down (the easy part) then work like a dog understanding good story-integrated description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: green_knight</title>
		<link>http://pcwrede.com/blog/working-at-what-isnt-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>green_knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcwrede.com/blog/?p=150#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always admired your willingness to venture into unsafe territory. It&#039;s a good policy to adopt. It&#039;s not just frightening (what if I can&#039;t get this to work) but also annoying when you have to learn to write all over - my insticts are off, my process is broken, my writing speed is glacial, and very little of the tips and tricks I&#039;ve picked up work anymore.

AMong other things, this is a book where the setting is tremendously important. The land - or rather guardian spirits tied to particular places - *is* a character, and without description there is no story. I can&#039;t do the usual layering thing where I sketch out dialogue and stage directions in first draft. And because it&#039;s alternate history I keep having to run to the library to acquire the knowledge I then need to twist sideways to fit into my alt-20th Century-with-Faerie. 

But it&#039;s great fun whenever it is working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always admired your willingness to venture into unsafe territory. It&#8217;s a good policy to adopt. It&#8217;s not just frightening (what if I can&#8217;t get this to work) but also annoying when you have to learn to write all over &#8211; my insticts are off, my process is broken, my writing speed is glacial, and very little of the tips and tricks I&#8217;ve picked up work anymore.</p>
<p>AMong other things, this is a book where the setting is tremendously important. The land &#8211; or rather guardian spirits tied to particular places &#8211; *is* a character, and without description there is no story. I can&#8217;t do the usual layering thing where I sketch out dialogue and stage directions in first draft. And because it&#8217;s alternate history I keep having to run to the library to acquire the knowledge I then need to twist sideways to fit into my alt-20th Century-with-Faerie. </p>
<p>But it&#8217;s great fun whenever it is working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

