For years and years, I’ve been pointing out to people that talent is one of the least important things a writer needs – because you don’t actually need very much to go on with, and it’s actually pretty common to have that much. In fact, “talent” is as common as mud; what’s rare is the motivation to sit down and actually do something with one’s talent, the discipline to do it regularly, and the persistence to stick with it until it’s finished.

What isn’t quite so obvious is that having too much talent can be a drawback. I’ve seen far too many new and would-be writers who’ve written amazing first novels or parts of novels…and then died on the vine when writing suddenly got hard. They were used to being able to produce words easily, words that were better – a lot better – than the words being produced by their fellow first-novelists. What they didn’t know was what to do when the words stopped coming, or when they stopped improving.

Basically, these writers were coasting before they even got started. Their first book (or a significant part of it) came easily to them, without a lot of the flaws that are usual in a first novel, and they expected that to keep on happening. They never had to work at getting better, so they don’t try (some of them appear not to know how). When writing starts to get hard, they either wait for the solution to come to them, or they give up. Either way, their competition starts out-producing them pretty quickly…and since those other writers are used to working at getting better (because they’ve had to do so all along), they get better faster, and go on getting better while Mr. Talented Writer stagnates.

The prose and the techniques that look so great in that first novel (because Mr. Talent was doing things no other first-novelist was doing) don’t look nearly so impressive in the fifth novel. Editors and readers expect writers to improve, regardless of where the writer started, and if the writer doesn’t, folks start to lose interest.

And then, of course, there’s the fact that nobody, not even Mr. Talent, is good at everything that goes into a story…which means that even those early, surprising books that were so much better than the other first novels still had some flaws. Maybe even serious flaws. People will overlook that in a first novel, but they start getting impatient if a writer is still having the same problems with plotting or characters or whatever in their fifth book.

All too often, though, the writers who’ve been admired early on for their talent do not recognize any flaws in their work, and thus see no reason to try to get better…at least until they’ve been whopped upside the head by reality a couple of times. I recall one young gentleman whom I met on a visit to a high school; his English teachers raved to me about how great his writing was, how imaginative, how creative. They’d obviously been raving to him along the same lines, because he clearly expected me to refer his short story to the nearest professional editor I knew, and he was quite put out by the amount of red ink on the manuscript when I handed him back his great, imaginative, creative…and ungrammatical, plotless, poorly thought-out…story.

In my experience, people like that make one of three choices.

1) Most of them quit writing fairly quickly when their stuff starts coming back from the professional markets, because what got them to try for publication was the fact that so many other people thought they’d be good at it. Faced with the evidence that they’re not going to be able to just toss a manuscript on an editor’s desk and listen to the praise roll in, they give up (often with some grumbles about the Big Bad Publishing Industry and how it isn’t open to great, imaginative, creative work like theirs.

2) The next-largest group submits their story a couple of times, then decides that since the Evil Publishing Industry obviously doesn’t appreciate their work, they’ll self-publish. This used to be a fairly small group, because pre-Internet, most of this category went to vanity presses that required up-front payments of several thousand dollars, so you had to have quite a bit of money to go this route. These days, Amazon and the Internet and print-on-demand have made it easy, so this group is growing rapidly.

And 3) one way or another, the author realizes that he or she still has a lot to learn, talent or not, decides they really do want to learn it, and buckles down to the learning part. The realization can come in a variety of ways: sometimes, it’s getting a couple of stories ripped apart in a good workshop or class; sometimes, it’s a series of rejection letters; sometimes, it’s an uncomplimentary review of their self-published masterpiece that hits home. Whatever it is, it provides them with the motivation to really start working on the discipline and persistence parts. They’re the ones who eventually make themselves careers in writing.

Mind you, every writer needs to have a certain amount of confidence and belief in his/her work, or we’d never send anything out. There’s a difference, however, between thinking that a particular story is as good as one can presently make it, and thinking that anything and everything one writes is brilliant and not to be improved upon.

6 Comments
  1. “Mind you, every writer needs to have a certain amount of confidence and belief in his/her work, or we’d never send anything out. There’s a difference, however, between thinking that a particular story is as good as one can presently make it, and thinking that anything and everything one writes is brilliant and not to be improved upon.”

    I can’t agree with you more with that statement. Writing (lining up words one after the other) isn’t that hard. Sometimes they flow a lot classier than others, but if *writing* was too difficult, I wouldn’t have ever sat down and done it. My experience of writing a book was the realization that I had never edited or revised properly before. When my editor handed my isn’t-it-wonderful-all-finished manuscript back to me with an apologetic “don’t freak out” expression, I was really startled. I had never seen paper bleed so much in my life. But I needed that feedback. If she had not been willing to help me and if I had not been willing to listen, I never would have seen what was ‘wrong’ or ‘missing’ or ‘awkward’.

    I would also like to say that I am self-published. I chose that option because of the very reasons that you stated. Yes, lots of self-published work is dreadful, published by people who revise once or twice and call it perfect. I understand that to have my work be credible, I have to put in much more time and effort than that, and I do. I do find it frustrating at times to find myself lumped together in a category of writers (many of who) don’t put in the work required. But I will also state that just because you are traditional does not mean that all traditional books are sublime, either. I find it frustrating when people pit self-publishers against traditional ones as if there is a war going on. The writers who are serious about being writers work very hard and put out books that show that, no matter what umbrella they are under.

    I am the first to say that my novels are never the way I wish they could be. I know they can be better–but I try my best to get them as wonderful as I can. What’s really great is that a year or two goes by, I pick up a copy and think: “Hey, this really isn’t that bad” and lower down think, “Eeee, I wish I could change that line!”

    All the best,
    Melissa

  2. When I was a girl and first writing, I kept losing interest in things. Then, when I was about 13, I one day sat down and read my half-stories and discovered I didn’t know how to transition from the first scene to the next. No wonder I lost interest.

    I used that technique several times over my adolscence to discover which technique I didn’t know this time.

  3. I think another problem that happens is this: it’s so easy to see talent in other people, and not in oneself. It’s easy to see all the flaws in your own writing and that can hold you back from ever submitting it, because you see other things that are so much better. True talent is something that you grow and develop – others (or even yourself) might be born with it, but it’s the people who work at it who succeed.

  4. Another hazard is, when her easy bits (conversation, or description, or whatever) have been praised, the writer sets herself high expectations that the other bits (transitions or whatever) should be brilliant also. So she doesn’t settle for filling the gaps with workmanlike prose.

  5. I think teachers sometimes forget to add “for a high school student” to their praise. Or they don’t forget, but saying it that way feels like a back-handed compliment. Or maybe they just don’t realize that praise like that can actually keep someone from becoming great.

    When I was in seventh or eighth grade, I was reading my way through MZB’s Sword and Sorceress anthologies. The instructions for submitting a story were in one of the books (possibly in every one?), so I decided to do it. Having gotten the sort of extravegent praise you’re talking about, the rejection letter was a huge and unpleasant surprise. I did what she suggested in the rejection, though: write more. “Apply the seat of your pants to the seat of the chair.” I still remember the exact words.